What's in a Name? Adjustment to Functional Somatic Syndromes?
Year
2010
Season
Fall
Paper Type
Master's Thesis
College
College of Arts and Sciences
Degree Name
Master of Arts in General Psychology (MAGP)
Department
Psychology
Abstract
The purpose of this quasi-experimental study was to examine illness representations and adjustment in participants with functional somatic syndromes (FSS), medically unexplained symptoms (MUS), and conventional disease (CD). Participants (n = 276) experiencing persistent physical symptoms, and diagnosed with either a CD, a FSS, or having MUS completed an online survey. The results of this study suggest that individuals' beliefs about their illness significantly influences their adjustment. Identity and consequences were the most important predictors of adjustment. Participants who believed more symptoms were associated with their illness and that their illness held serious consequences were more likely to experience lower social functioning and vitality. The results of this study also suggest that the association of illness representations with outcomes is not mediated by coping procedures nor by illness category or label. This study contributes greatly to the research of illness representations as no known research has compared the illness representations of CD, FSS, and MUS participants.
Suggested Citation
Radcliff, Katie A., "What's in a Name? Adjustment to Functional Somatic Syndromes?" (2010). UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 1042.
https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/1042