Year
2019
Season
Fall
Paper Type
Master's Thesis
College
College of Arts and Sciences
Degree Name
Master of Arts in International Affairs (MAIA)
Department
Political Science & Public Administration
NACO controlled Corporate Body
University of North Florida. Department of Political Science and Public Administration
First Advisor
Dr. Joshua Gellers
Second Advisor
Dr. Chau Kelly
Abstract
On the evening of November 8th, 2016, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced to a shocked India that the two most common banknotes would thereafter cease to be legal tender. Newly designed notes were printed and dispersed to Indians who were forced to wait in long bank and ATM lines, which frequently ran out of cash due to such high demand. There were reports of people dying in lines, not getting paid their salaries due to the chaos, and losing everything in the resulting inflation that plagued rural farmers. Since then, India has seen a rise in cash usage rates compared to pre-demonetization levels, coupled with a loss of precious GDP and growth rates. On the flip side of the demonetization coin lies Sweden, the most cashless society in the world, whose long transition to predominantly digital payment methods has been accepted by most people. Many factors separate India’s demonetization from Sweden’s. To analyze and compare these two countries that underwent demonetization efforts, their cultural factors, such as uncertainty avoidance, preference for cash, jugaad, and political culture must be studied in addition to the economic factors of the origin of change and income inequality. This study shows that both cultural and economic factors contributed heavily to the origins and impacts of demonetization events in India and Sweden.
Suggested Citation
Browske, Danielle, "Note the Change: a Comparative Study of Demonetization Efforts in India and Sweden" (2019). UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 920.
https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/920
Included in
Comparative Politics Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, International Economics Commons, Political Economy Commons