Year
2020
Season
Fall
Paper Type
Doctoral Dissertation
College
College of Education and Human Services
Degree Name
Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership (EdD)
Department
Leadership, School Counseling & Sport Management
NACO controlled Corporate Body
University of North Florida. Department of Leadership, School Counseling & Sports Management
First Advisor
Dr. Linda Skrla
Second Advisor
Dr. David Hoppey
Rights Statement
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
Third Advisor
Dr. Anne Swanson
Fourth Advisor
Dr. Carol Macedonia
Department Chair
Dr. Liz Gregg
College Dean
Dr. Dan Dinsmore
Abstract
Abstract
Accusations pertaining to insufficient accountability for private schools that provide alternative educational options for special education students have led to opposition to those same schools. The opposition results in part from the schools’ acceptance of state funded vouchers and scholarships. In Florida, state vouchers provide funds which support alternative educational placement for students from lower socio-economic status and/or who have identified disabilities. Because they are not subject to state or federal government jurisdiction, private schools have the right to set their own policies and procedures to determine appropriateness of curriculum, assessment, accountability, personnel training and development, funding, and governance (United States Department of Education, 2009). In the absence of external standards in these areas, private schools’ ability to serve students who would, under public education, be protected under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is a matter of dispute. The contention stems from concern that private schools are not held accountable to provide students with the same educational rights that IDEA intended, and that data is not tracked to assure effective educational and financial stewardship. Those opposing educational vouchers question private schools’ accountability and oversight, stating that agencies providing these funds and the schools receiving them should have clearly defined parameters to ensure appropriate use of designated funds.
This study applied previous research on identified High Leverage Practices (HLPs) and Evidence Based Practices (EBPs) in public schools to a private school setting to establish accountability measures in private school special education programs which utilize state vouchers. It identifies those practices which experts concur on as providing a high quality education as they best support the education of students with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDDs), specific to private education settings which receive state and federal dollars to instruct these privately placed students. The selected practices included teacher professional development to support instruction of students with IDDs, accountability with respect to student progress and measurements of that progress, identification of high quality instruction, opportunities for inclusive activities outside of the separate special education school program, and transition program opportunities to support students with intellectual disabilities.
This research proposes accountability measurements and recommends fundamental standards of practice which align with a high-quality education to best serve students with developmental and intellectual disabilities who are served in private schools which accept state funding.
Suggested Citation
Rains, Debra L., "Defining Accountability and Best Practices in Private Schools Which Receive State Funds for Students with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities" (2020). UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 988.
https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/988
Included in
Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Special Education and Teaching Commons