The Efficacy of a Brief Nature Sound Intervention on Muscle Tension, Pulse Rate, and Self- Reported Stress: Nature Contact Micro-Break in an Office or Waiting Room
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-1-2016
Abstract
Background: There is a growing recognition that environmental design impacts health and well-being. Nature contact is a design feature or exposure that is especially important in public health and healthcare. To date, there are limited findings on the impact of nature sounds. Objective: This experimental study was designed to examine the effect of nature sounds on physiological and psychological stress. Methods: Participants were randomized into one of three groups—silence (n = 9), nature sound (n = 17), and classical music (n = 14)—and listened to the assigned sound for 15 min in an office or waiting room-like environment. Pre- and postdata were collected including muscle tension (electromyogram), pulse rate, and self-reported stress. Results: With the exception of pulse rate, there were no statistical differences in baseline or demographics among groups. A paired t-test by group showed a decrease in muscle tension, pulse rate, and self-reported stress in the nature group and no significant differences in the control or the classical music groups. The significant reduction in muscle tension occurred at least by 7 min of listening to the nature sound. Conclusion: This study highlights the potential benefit of even very brief (less than 7 min) exposure to nature sounds. Brief nature sound “booster breaks” are a promising area for future research with important practical implications.
Publication Title
Health Environments Research and Design Journal
Volume
10
Issue
1
First Page
45
Last Page
51
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.1177/1937586715619741
ISSN
19375867
Citation Information
Largo-Wight, O’Hara, B. K., & Chen, W. W. (2016). The Efficacy of a Brief Nature Sound Intervention on Muscle Tension, Pulse Rate, and Self-Reported Stress: Nature Contact Micro-Break in an Office or Waiting Room. HERD, 10(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586715619741