The courage of conviction: Andreia as precondition for philosophic examination in Plato's Protagoras and Republic
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-4-2015
Abstract
There are at least two apparently conflicting views of courage found in Plato's dialogues: the intellectualist view exemplified by Socratess identification of courage with wisdom as found in the Protagoras; and the dispositional view of courage as a natural temperament to overcome fear in situations of danger, the necessary qualification for the auxiliary class in the Republic. In this paper I argue that these views are complementary, dispositional courage being a necessary precondition for the pursuit of the proper human excellence of wisdom. I demonstrate this by considering the role opinion plays in each understanding of courage, showing both that dispositional courage is necessary to ensure that proper opinions be retained in the pursuit of wisdom and that wisdom is necessary to guarantee these opinions are the proper ones. Finally, I argue that not only is this relationship of the two understandings of courage present in the Republic, but even in the Protagoras Socratess method of conducting the elenchus betrays awareness on his part of the importance of dispositional courage in the pursuit of wisdom
Publication Title
British Journal for the History of Philosophy
Volume
23
Issue
3
First Page
438
Last Page
458
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.1080/09608788.2015.1013913
ISSN
09608788
E-ISSN
14693526
Citation Information
Carelli. (2015). The Courage of Conviction: Andreia as Precondition for Philosophic Examination in Plato’s Protagoras and Republic. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 23(3), 438–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2015.1013913